🔗 Share this article

In a significant regulatory appeal, the Australian classification review board has overturned a earlier ruling that prevented viewers in Australia from seeing video footage of the shooting incident involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. The appeal was lodged by Elon Musk's social media platform, arguing against an directive sought by the national eSafety commissioner.

Details of the Original Ban

Following the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in September, the regulator petitioned the review board to assess and rate the available footage. The board initially ruled the content was "refused classification", a rating that allowed the regulator to instruct platforms to geo-block the posts for users in Australia.

The platform X challenged the decision for two separate videos depicting the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a similar ruling on a separate video—showing the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had likewise been deemed "refused classification".

Arguments Presented and Final Ruling

Arguing its case, X asserted that the footage in question contained only brief violence with no visible weapon. It was argued the footage was grainy and the focus shifted rapidly from the individual to the surrounding crowd.

X maintained the footage was not overly graphic, gratuitous, or offensive, adding that it served as a neutral objective record of "a notorious public event of public importance that generated extensive public discourse". X even compared the footage and the historic film of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

The majority of the classification panel concluded that, "despite the terrible nature of the event," the content did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. The board suggested that a more detailed depiction with different editing could have met that threshold. Consequently, the panel changed the rating of the content to R18+.

A Dissenting Viewpoint

Some on the board disagreed, arguing the video was "a shareable video for the probable aim of entertainment and/or personal gain (such as engagement metrics)". This view stated the parallel with the Zapruder JFK film was flawed, as the Kennedy video was released years after the event, "after public sentiment regarding it had calmed".

Response Following the Decision

In a statement on its global government affairs account, the platform welcomed the ruling.

"We challenged this decision to defend freedom of expression and the critical nature of access to information about issues of public interest. Our commitment remains dedicated to safeguarding these principles."

Representatives for the safety regulator also welcomed the ruling, but pointed out that the revised classification now means platforms "have obligations to prevent R18+ material is not accessible to users who are minors".

Broader Context on Sensitive Footage

Separately, the eSafety commissioner has not issued formal notices to platforms this week regarding disturbing videos from the recent Bondi beach terror attack shared across social media. Officials commented that while the images were distressing, they had not met the high threshold for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, the companies have been advised to apply warning labels and screens, such as blurring, on this material in line with their own content policies.