🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to reinitiate nuclear talks with Washington on condition that it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi stated solely negotiations worked, and revealed new appeals had originated from go-betweens to resume discussions with the Trump administration. He said Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet allow the global atomic watchdog to access struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Walking a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is treading a complex path since Iran aims to avoid appear to be proceeding from a situation of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out stronger in military terms and emotionally from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the impasse in the previous talks.

Earlier Negotiations Abruptly Terminated

The previous five rounds of discussions between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that concluded with Donald Trump claiming the sites had been eliminated. Following this, EU nations used their authority to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Suggested

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that American atomic experts could operate inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Representatives asserted repeatedly they had achieved a deal with the US representative the US official only for the arrangement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Status

Iran's diplomats declared the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be revived in certain ways if negotiations resume.

The American leader recently said he had been getting signals that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but in private Iranian officials claim they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from America either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been accused of inactivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran says negotiations is not part of a show.

Negotiating Stance

In his remarks to the forum, aimed to portray the US as a controlling nation that exploits the idea of global regulations, Araghchi stated the 12-day war demonstrated the conflict could not be settled by combat operations. He stated the assaults commenced with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were executed with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making trust difficult to restore.

Dialogue Stays the Primary Solution

The foreign minister said: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned diplomacy; it was America and the western countries that had consistently sought to enforce their desires during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be viable and remains the ultimate answer to settle conflicts, but its criteria, guidelines and fundamentals must be respected."

"In case they talk to the nation of Iran with the tone of respect and respect, they will receive a reply in the identical language."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Tehran representatives as the conflict of recovery and reconstruction, Araghchi stated he was confident Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We learned multiple understandings from this war; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He continued: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to obliterate, remains in place. The facilities and equipment, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but failed to destroy. The Iranian people have become stronger, more cohesive, and more supportive of the government and the country in the wake of this attack."